- From: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
- Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 22:56:20 -0400
- To: "Boley, Harold" <Harold.Boley@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca>
- Cc: "RIF" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
I don't think we should include Nio in FLD. First, KBDSTRING is already an extensibility mechanism. Second, inflationary negation is not a logical negation and so it is not suitable for FLD unless FLD is extended to FRD (for all of RIF), which I don't see happening on the horizon. Finally, I think Nio is too cute and too uninformative. I'd propose iNeg. michael On Mon, 4 May 2009 15:18:42 -0400 "Boley, Harold" <Harold.Boley@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca> wrote: > NEGATOR ::= 'Neg' | 'Naf' | 'Nio' | KBRDSTRING -- -- michael
Received on Tuesday, 5 May 2009 02:56:59 UTC