- From: Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr>
- Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:29:46 +0100
- To: kifer@cs.sunysb.edu
- CC: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, public-rif-wg@w3.org
Michael Kifer wrote:
> [...] This is what I was
> planning to use for aggregates (I proposed this several months ago in an email)
> and for shorthands like a[b->c b->d] == a[b-> {c d}]
Does == mean equivalent?
If we do something like this, how do we deal with set-valued attributes?
I mean: is a[b->{c d} b->{e f}] equivalent to a[b->{c d e f}] or a[b->{{c d}{e f}}] or a[b->{c d {e f}}] etc?
(Btw, this is another form of the question I had in mind with what you called my "puzzle" about a[b->a.b], in [1]).
Cheers,
Christian
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2009Mar/0009.html
Received on Thursday, 12 March 2009 16:30:47 UTC