- From: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 23:49:29 +0200
- To: Stella Mitchell <stellamit@gmail.com>
- Cc: RIF <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
> > In yesterday's telecon, we reviewed previously approved test cases in > light of the most recent specs, and agreed that [1] is obsolete but > think that [2] is still valid. Could you verify that? Correct. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Annotation_Entailment > [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Non-Annotation_Entailment > > Also, in these proposed tests, did you intend to use an import profile > of Simple in [3], so that it is the same as the profile used in [4], > and doesn't distract from the main point of this pair of tests? Yes. Cheers, Jos > > [3] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/RDF_Combination_SubClass_5 > [4] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/RDF_Combination_SubClass_6 > > Stella
Received on Wednesday, 24 June 2009 21:50:19 UTC