- From: Stella Mitchell <stellamit@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:20:02 -0400
- To: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>, RIF <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Hi Jos, In yesterday's telecon, we reviewed previously approved test cases in light of the most recent specs, and agreed that [1] is obsolete but think that [2] is still valid. Could you verify that? [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Annotation_Entailment [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Non-Annotation_Entailment Also, in these proposed tests, did you intend to use an import profile of Simple in [3], so that it is the same as the profile used in [4], and doesn't distract from the main point of this pair of tests? [3] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/RDF_Combination_SubClass_5 [4] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/RDF_Combination_SubClass_6 Stella
Received on Wednesday, 24 June 2009 21:20:43 UTC