- From: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@googlemail.com>
- Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 17:59:54 +0000
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- CC: RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Sandro Hawke wrote: >> At the telecon I took an action to check that in the builtins_binary >> test case [1] the example literal >> >> "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz/+"^^xs:base64Binary >> >> is a legal lexical form. It is used twice in the test case. >> >> I think it is not. According to the XSD spec [2] the number of non-white >> space characters has to be a multiple of 4 (you use trailing "=" to pad >> out) whereas this string is 54 characters. The easy fix would be to >> stuff two more legal characters on the end of the test string. > > Let's add "0123456789" into the string. That makes it the string of all > legal characters, and also makes it a multiple of 4 chars (since it's 64 > chars). Good idea. >> Shall I just go in and edit the test case? Since we already approved it >> I'm not sure what the right process is. > > In this case, I think it's okay to edit it, and get confirmation from > the group when your action item is reviewed. Done. Dave > > -- Sandro > >> Dave >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Builtins_Binary >> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#base64Binary >>
Received on Tuesday, 8 December 2009 18:00:38 UTC