- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 12:57:37 -0500
- To: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@googlemail.com>
- cc: RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
> At the telecon I took an action to check that in the builtins_binary
> test case [1] the example literal
>
> "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz/+"^^xs:base64Binary
>
> is a legal lexical form. It is used twice in the test case.
>
> I think it is not. According to the XSD spec [2] the number of non-white
> space characters has to be a multiple of 4 (you use trailing "=" to pad
> out) whereas this string is 54 characters. The easy fix would be to
> stuff two more legal characters on the end of the test string.
Let's add "0123456789" into the string. That makes it the string of all
legal characters, and also makes it a multiple of 4 chars (since it's 64
chars).
> Shall I just go in and edit the test case? Since we already approved it
> I'm not sure what the right process is.
In this case, I think it's okay to edit it, and get confirmation from
the group when your action item is reviewed.
-- Sandro
> Dave
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Builtins_Binary
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#base64Binary
>
Received on Tuesday, 8 December 2009 17:57:38 UTC