- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:56:10 -0400
- To: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Dave Reynolds wrote: > Axel Polleres wrote: >> I can't see any resolution to add... >> >> # xsd:nonPositiveInteger >> # xsd:positiveInteger >> # xsd:negativeInteger >> # xsd:long >> # xsd:int >> # xsd:short >> # xsd:byte >> # xsd:unsignedLong >> # xsd:unsignedInt >> # xsd:unsignedShort >> # xsd:unsignedByte >> >> although they are in OWL2...I tacitly assume we want those as well? > > Not just tacitly. We explicitly discussed them, e.g. > > "PROPOSED: Add the following primitive data types, without builtins > (other than guard predicates) for subtypes of xs:string and xs:integer: > xsd:nonPositiveInteger, xsd:positiveInteger, xsd:negativeInteger, > xsd:long, xsd:int, xsd:short, xsd:byte, xsd:unsignedLong, > xsd:unsignedInt, xsd:unsignedShort, xsd:unsignedByte, xsd:float, > xsd:normalizedString, xsd:token, xsd:language, xsd:Name, xsd:NCName, xsd " > > but then found it easier the phrase the final resolution as: > > "RESOLVED: support all OWL datatypes in RIF except owl:rational (to be > discussed further)" stupid me, it just - obviously - wasn't yet copied to the resolutions page. all fine, was a bit tired when I wrote that mail, sorry :-) > Dave -- Dr. Axel Polleres Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland, Galway email: axel.polleres@deri.org url: http://www.polleres.net/
Received on Friday, 17 April 2009 11:56:54 UTC