- From: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 08:45:17 +0100
- To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- CC: "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Axel Polleres wrote: > I can't see any resolution to add... > > # xsd:nonPositiveInteger > # xsd:positiveInteger > # xsd:negativeInteger > # xsd:long > # xsd:int > # xsd:short > # xsd:byte > # xsd:unsignedLong > # xsd:unsignedInt > # xsd:unsignedShort > # xsd:unsignedByte > > although they are in OWL2...I tacitly assume we want those as well? Not just tacitly. We explicitly discussed them, e.g. "PROPOSED: Add the following primitive data types, without builtins (other than guard predicates) for subtypes of xs:string and xs:integer: xsd:nonPositiveInteger, xsd:positiveInteger, xsd:negativeInteger, xsd:long, xsd:int, xsd:short, xsd:byte, xsd:unsignedLong, xsd:unsignedInt, xsd:unsignedShort, xsd:unsignedByte, xsd:float, xsd:normalizedString, xsd:token, xsd:language, xsd:Name, xsd:NCName, xsd " but then found it easier the phrase the final resolution as: "RESOLVED: support all OWL datatypes in RIF except owl:rational (to be discussed further)" Dave -- Hewlett-Packard Limited Registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Friday, 17 April 2009 07:46:05 UTC