- From: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
- Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 12:17:32 -0400
- To: Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr>
- Cc: Patrick Albert <palbert@ilog.fr>, Chris Welty <cawelty@gmail.com>, Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>, Adrian Paschke <adrian.paschke@biotec.tu-dresden.de>, public-rif-wg@w3.org
On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 16:17:02 +0200 Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr> wrote: > So leaving my chair's hat aside for a moment, I do not quite understand why > PRD would be bound to a logical approach for what is specific to the world of > production rules: PRD is bound to the syntax of BLD where their semantics > agree; but PRD can do whatever is practical and useful to the PR crowd for > whatever BLD cannot express. Patrick's suggestions went well beyond that. He ventured to comment about frames and proposed syntax that cripples their usefulness for logical dialects. --michael
Received on Tuesday, 9 September 2008 16:18:39 UTC