- From: Chris Welty <cawelty@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 13:42:17 -0400
- To: kifer@cs.sunysb.edu
- CC: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>, Adrian Paschke <adrian.paschke@biotec.tu-dresden.de>, public-rif-wg@w3.org
</chair>
Michael Kifer wrote:
>
> On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:44:37 -0400
> Chris Welty <cawelty@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Syntax for named arguments to use '('Name TERM)')' instead of (Name '->' TERM)
>> Syntax for frames to use TERM '::' TERM instead of TERM '->' TERM
>> Syntax for member to use TERM 'TY' TERM instead of TERM '#' TERM
>> Syntax for subclass to us TERM 'SC' TERM instaed of TERM '##' TERM
>
>
> You are proposing to replace perfectly good syntax with ugly alternatives.
No, I am proposing to replace absolutely RIDICULOUS syntax with something less
so. I used shortened symbols because you have been arguing for 1-2 character
operators.
> CSMA's proposal for using Name = Term is bad because it misleadingly suggests
> that there is only one value for Name, but in fact the value of Name is a set
> and Term is just one of the values in a set.
Agreed.
> If you want to overhaul the syntax and free up -> for (classical) implication,
> then let's use something that mnemonically makes sense:
>
> a isa b
> c subclassOf cc or c sub cc
> name hasValue val or name hasVal val
That's fine with me. Mnemonics are better than meaningless things like ##, but
spelling it out is even more preferable to me. I don't feel that strongly about it.
> etc.
>
> We should use a different sign for rule implication both in BLD and in PRD.
> That should be => <= and not -> <- (provided that we agree on the overall
> overhaul).
That, too is fine with me. I actually don't care what symbol is used for
implication, nor whether they are different for bld and prd, all I care about
NOT HAVING "->" in the frame and named argument syntax.
However, using --> instead of -> is also ridiculous. I like having a symbol
that indicates direction, and can be inverted, but I'd also be fine with good
old IF THEN.
-Chris
<chair>
>
>
> --michael
>
--
Dr. Christopher A. Welty IBM Watson Research Center
+1.914.784.7055 19 Skyline Dr.
cawelty@gmail.com Hawthorne, NY 10532
http://www.research.ibm.com/people/w/welty
Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2008 17:42:59 UTC