- From: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
- Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 09:47:32 -0400
- To: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>
- Cc: Chris Welty <cawelty@gmail.com>, "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 09:32:01 +0200 Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it> wrote: > > I think we should do what is right and the LC consideration is not very > > important, if the change is relatively simple (which is what will be in this > > case). > > > > I think the right thing to do is Atomic-Equal|Frame > > Did you mean ATOMIC-Equal? ATOMIC includes Frame. Yes. > > I think the LC thing will need to be redone anyway, because of the problem with > > the External primitive, which we discussed: it should really have the remote > > site's IRI as an additional argument. > > I see that this is going in the direction of a general querying > mechanism of external data sources, rather than built-ins (which was the > original motivation for Externals). > I would prefer to just stick with the built-ins in BLD and leave > possible external query mechanisms to extensions. Of course this was the whole idea. It is precisely the reason why it was called External and not Builtin! michael
Received on Tuesday, 7 October 2008 13:48:32 UTC