- From: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>
- Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 09:32:01 +0200
- To: kifer@cs.sunysb.edu
- CC: Chris Welty <cawelty@gmail.com>, "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <48EB1071.5090606@inf.unibz.it>
Michael Kifer wrote: > > > On Mon, 06 Oct 2008 19:34:47 -0400 > Chris Welty <cawelty@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> At the F2F we had a lengthy but ultimately inconclusive discussion on what to >> allow in an external call: >> >> 1) ATOM >> 2) ATOMIC >> 3) ATOM | FRAME >> >> In a straw poll, one person objected to each choice, and there were 3, 6, and 2 >> people resp. who preferred each choice. > > I remember that csma did retract his objections to (3). Good! In that case we can progress by leaving things as they are by closing the issue. > > >> While more people prefer choice 2, it would require re-doing last call. 1&3 >> would not, as 1 is covered by external frames being at-risk, and 3 is the way >> the spec reads now. > > I think we should do what is right and the LC consideration is not very > important, if the change is relatively simple (which is what will be in this > case). > > I think the right thing to do is Atomic-Equal|Frame Did you mean ATOMIC-Equal? ATOMIC includes Frame. > > Why minus Equal? In principle equality does not matter here, but one should > realize that External(a=b) does not imply a=b. So, I am afraid that some people > will be confused. This is one thing. My reason for objecting to equality in externals is the following: = is a special logical symbol whose meaning (i.e., the identity relation) is given by the logical language (i.e., RIF), like the connectives and quantifiers. > But maybe this is a non-issue. > > I think the LC thing will need to be redone anyway, because of the problem with > the External primitive, which we discussed: it should really have the remote > site's IRI as an additional argument. I see that this is going in the direction of a general querying mechanism of external data sources, rather than built-ins (which was the original motivation for Externals). I would prefer to just stick with the built-ins in BLD and leave possible external query mechanisms to extensions. Best, Jos > > > --michael > > >> Let's try and come to some sort of closure by email. >> > -- Jos de Bruijn debruijn@inf.unibz.it +390471016224 http://www.debruijn.net/ ---------------------------------------------- No one who cannot rejoice in the discovery of his own mistakes deserves to be called a scholar. - Donald Foster
Received on Tuesday, 7 October 2008 07:32:57 UTC