- From: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
- Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 09:58:19 -0500
- To: "Patrick Albert" <palbert@ilog.fr>
- Cc: "Gary Hallmark" <gary.hallmark@oracle.com>, "Dave Reynolds" <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Boley, Harold" <Harold.Boley@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca>, "Adrian Paschke" <Adrian.Paschke@gmx.de>, "Axel Polleres" <axel.polleres@deri.org>, "RIF WG" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:06:02 +0100 "Patrick Albert" <palbert@ilog.fr> wrote: > Right, this task stretches us a little too much... :-/ > > I am happy to support your proposal "allow # and ## in Core in rule > conditions and *unconditional* rule conclusions" as long as in the > "unconditional conclusions" we limit ourselves to the creation of new > objects, not including the modification of the class of an already > existing object. The latter (creation vs modification) is not possible to define in the core.
Received on Monday, 17 November 2008 14:59:18 UTC