Re: BLD -> XML serialization

[ I finally caught up on these threads, and looked over your generated
grammar html files...    no particular comment except this one, right
now. ]

> My overall comments: in general, I find the current serialization style
> uselessly verbose with redundant tag nestings. IMHO it should be made
> terser and clearer. I know that this follows a fully-striped style based
> on the EBNF.

What kind of code do you use to go between objects and XML?  (I ask,
to help understand why the verbosity is "useless" and "redundant".)

Would it be easy enough to make a version of the BNF->XML table which
showed the nicer serializations you're thinking of?  It would make a fun
contrast to the version with the RDF/XML serializations.      (it's kind
of tedious to do the whole table, though, maybe.)

    -- Sandro