- From: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
- Date: Sat, 03 May 2008 11:46:45 -0400
- To: Hassan Aït-Kaci <hak@ilog.com>
- Cc: "Boley\, Harold" <Harold.Boley@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca>, "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
> > Michael Kifer wrote: > > XML does not understand curie macros, so rif:iri is just that for XML. > > In the presentation syntax, rif:iri is not a "rif:iri" but a macro that > > expands into something long. So, the earlier use of rif:iri and similar in > > XML was actually a mistake. > > OK. So you mean to say, "... HAS BEEN actually a mistake" (and still > IS as far I understand). Correcting this simple mistake is easy then. > How come it has not been fixed in all the BLD documents and examples > after the resolution was passed 6 months ago? How many other such > "mistakes" remain in the current BLD draft that should be so corrected? > My question is a very pragmatic one: I am trying to implement the dang > thing. You can help find mistakes by volunteering to be a reviewer. --michael
Received on Saturday, 3 May 2008 15:47:29 UTC