- From: Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:07:27 +0200
- To: kifer@cs.sunysb.edu
- CC: Paul Vincent <pvincent@tibco.com>, RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Michael Kifer wrote: > Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr> wrote: > >>For the avoidance of doubt: I absolutely support that the >>interoperability between PRD and BLD should be maximal. But I see this >>as an XML syntax and a semantics related question; not a PS related one. > > We should strive to be compatible at all levels. No need for > gratuitous incompatibilities. Bis repetita supposedly placet, so let me write it again: having a different PS for a different target audience is not a gratuitous difference. Especially since BLD PS has been designed without being reused for PRD in mind. Cheers, Christian
Received on Monday, 23 June 2008 18:08:01 UTC