Re: [PRD] ACTION-531 Update PRD examples complete

Michael Kifer wrote:
> Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr> wrote:
> 
>>For the avoidance of doubt: I absolutely support that the 
>>interoperability between PRD and BLD should be maximal. But I see this 
>>as an XML syntax and a semantics related question; not a PS related one.
> 
> We should strive to be compatible at all levels. No need for
> gratuitous incompatibilities.

Bis repetita supposedly placet, so let me write it again: having a 
different PS for a different target audience is not a gratuitous 
difference. Especially since BLD PS has been designed without being 
reused for PRD in mind.

Cheers,

Christian