Re: [PRD] ACTION-531 Update PRD examples complete

On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 18:50:01 +0200
Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr> wrote:

> Paul Vincent wrote:
> > 
> > +1 on PRD representation compatibility with BLD 
> 
> For the avoidance of doubt: I absolutely support that the 
> interoperability between PRD and BLD should be maximal. But I see this 
> as an XML syntax and a semantics related question; not a PS related one.

We should strive to be compatible at all levels. No need for
gratuitous incompatibilities.


	--michael  

Received on Monday, 23 June 2008 17:59:38 UTC