- From: Paul Vincent <pvincent@tibco.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:04:02 -0700
- To: "Rule Interchange Format Working Group WG" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Probably yes, to be PRR compatible and for systems which model rulesets as functionals (/services). Paul Vincent TIBCO | Business Optimization | Business Rules & CEP > -----Original Message----- > From: public-rif-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rif-wg-request@w3.org] > On Behalf Of Rule Interchange Format Working Group Issue Tracker > Sent: 20 June 2008 16:18 > To: public-rif-wg@w3.org > Subject: ISSUE-63 (PRD Ruleset): Should PRD have a specific Ruleset > construct? [PRD ] > > > > ISSUE-63 (PRD Ruleset): Should PRD have a specific Ruleset construct? [PRD > ] > > http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/issues/ > > Raised by: Christian de Sainte Marie > On product: PRD > > Should PRD specify a Ruleset construct, distinct from the Group? If yes: > for what purpose (e.g. parameters)? > >
Received on Friday, 20 June 2008 16:04:52 UTC