- From: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>
- Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 16:03:09 +0200
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- CC: RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Sandro Hawke wrote: > [we should take this to WG list soon] Done :) For the information of the other working group participants: we were discussing the IRIs used for RDF/OWL import profiles. See below first my original e-mail, then Sandro's reply, and after that my reply to his reply :-) >> What would be better IRIs for specifying the RDF/OWL import profiles? >> >> http://www.w3.org/2007/rif-import-profile#XXX >> >> or >> >> http://www.w3.org/2008/rif-import-profile#XXX >> ? >> >> I originally used 2008, but I noticed that all other RIF namespaces are >> in 2007. > > Whether we use 2008 or 2007 is up to us. I'd lean toward 2007 for the > reason you note. Fine with me. > > What about just using the rif namespace? rif:OWL-DL ? I would be fine with that. However, this does seem to go against the design "principle" we decided on for built-ins, where we created two new namespaces, one for predicates, and one for functions. > > The real question in my mind is whether the URLs should be the same as > are used by owl:intendedProfile (assuming that gets adopted), in which > case it might be owl:OWL-DL or owl2:OWL-DL. Ugh. Yes, this would make sense. But do you think the OWL working group will specify profiles for OWL 1.0? > > Maybe we can raise the matter with OWL-WG quickly. Could you raise this matter? > > Another option which I'm kind of liking is: > > http://www.w3.org/2008/profile#OWL-DL > > which could be used by RIF, OWL, and anything else. > > (Then, I'm wondering whether to call it OWLDL, OWL-DL, OWL_DL, or the > lowercase versions of those. And whether to throw in a "1". I'm torn > mostly between OWL-DL and OWL_DL.) I'm basically fine with any IRI scheme you pick :-) I'm trusting you to make sure it follows good Web practice :-) Best, Jos > >> By the way, do we need to ask permission from someone to define this new >> namespace? > > Yes. Normally the team contact (me) does that as part of the > publication process of the first draft which uses it. > > -- Sandro -- Jos de Bruijn debruijn@inf.unibz.it +390471016224 http://www.debruijn.net/ ---------------------------------------------- An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes that can be made in a very narrow field. - Niels Bohr
Received on Tuesday, 3 June 2008 14:02:37 UTC