- From: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:23:54 +0200
- To: RIF <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 10 July 2008 12:24:40 UTC
I uncovered two issues with the BNF in BLD. For me they are not critical for last call, but for some they might be. The first issue is an error: Profile is not a Unicode string in the presentation syntax, but it is a term (see section 2.4). The second issue is not an error, but it can be considered misleading (the BNF is too liberal): in the presentation syntax, rules are quantified rule implications. So, an atomic formula is not a rule and may thus not be directly included in a group. According to the BNF, an atomic formula can be considered a rule; this is misleading. Best, Jos -- debruijn@inf.unibz.it Jos de Bruijn, http://www.debruijn.net/ ---------------------------------------------- One man that has a mind and knows it can always beat ten men who haven't and don't. -- George Bernard Shaw
Received on Thursday, 10 July 2008 12:24:40 UTC