- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:24:43 +0100
- To: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>
- CC: "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Jos de Bruijn wrote: >> It was basically, I guess, because the document started with onyl the >> title "Data Types and Builtins" ... I am anyway fine to change it to > > The title should be changed as well. already done. Should obviously be adoprted in FLD/BLD as well. Axel > Best, Jos > >> Datatypes consistently, without wanting to discuss whether one or the >> other makes "more sense", I just want it consistent. ;-) >> >> best, >> Axel >> >>> Best, Jos >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Unless I hear objections by tomorrow, I would change 1. >>>> even if the document is frozen, ok? >>>> >>>> And I would strongly suggest we resolve 2. before LC for BLD and SWC >>>> >>>> Axel >>>> >>> >> >> > -- Dr. Axel Polleres, Digital Enterprise Research Institute (DERI) email: axel.polleres@deri.org url: http://www.polleres.net/ Everything is possible: rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:Resource. rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:subPropertyOf. rdf:type rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:subClassOf. rdfs:subClassOf rdf:type owl:SymmetricProperty.
Received on Thursday, 10 July 2008 11:25:54 UTC