- From: Chris Welty <cawelty@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 14:45:49 -0400
- To: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
- CC: RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
I updated the working a little bit. I believe this is the formal definition of what "at risk" means. -Chris Michael Kifer wrote: > I object to the current formulation of the At Risk notes. > What does it mean "if not sufficiently implemented"? > It is not sufficiently clear to me. > Also, features #1,2,3, in BLD and the ones in DTB have all different > reasons for being marked at risk. > > > --michael > > -- Dr. Christopher A. Welty IBM Watson Research Center +1.914.784.7055 19 Skyline Dr. cawelty@gmail.com Hawthorne, NY 10532 http://www.research.ibm.com/people/w/welty
Received on Thursday, 3 July 2008 18:47:03 UTC