at risk features

• From: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
• Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 19:30:56 -0400
• To: public-rif-wg@w3.org (RIF WG)
• Message-ID: <4968.1215041456@cs.sunysb.edu>

I object to the current formulation of the At Risk notes.
What does it mean "if not sufficiently implemented"?
It is not sufficiently clear to me.
Also, features #1,2,3, in BLD and the ones in DTB have all different
reasons for being marked at risk.


	--michael  

Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2008 23:31:30 UTC