- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:13:57 -0500
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- cc: public-rif-wg@w3.org
> On 12 Dec 2008, at 14:38, Sandro Hawke wrote:
>
> > (re ACTION-673, closed)
> >
> > Yes, the (Manchester) OWL (Java) "API" (Toolkit)
>
> Let it go, Sandro. Let it go.
Too late, I just got a tatoo about it. It's quite elegant, really,
with all the thorns.
> > [1] is supposed to
> > parse the OWL 2 Functional Syntax (their presentation syntax). We
> > still
> > have the question of how we'll actually use this code -- who is
> > writing
> > the test case manifest/processing code -- but there's probably no big
> > reason to disallow OWL Functional syntax in our test cases.
>
> One can use the web service as well:
> http://owl.cs.manchester.ac.uk/converter/
> URI recipes:
> http://owl.cs.manchester.ac.uk/converter/restful.jsp
Thanks!
- s
Received on Friday, 12 December 2008 16:14:38 UTC