- From: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 10:46:10 +0100
- To: RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Dave Reynolds wrote: > What other issues have I missed? 6. Relationship to PRD How literally do we mean "CORE is the intersection of PRD and BLD"? One approach would be to make CORE a subset of BLD such that a CORE ruleset would be a legal BLD ruleset but would also be implementable by means of a typical production rule engine. An extension of that would be to provide a syntactic mapping from CORE to PRD which preserves ground entailments. That way any PRD conformant system could implement CORE by implementing that syntactic transformation. Another approach would be to modify the syntax of PRD so that a CORE ruleset could be both a legal BLD ruleset and legal PRD ruleset. [My working assumption has been that we would take the middle approach - a syntactic transform to show the relationship between CORE and PRD but that might not right.] Dave -- Hewlett-Packard Limited Registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Sunday, 17 August 2008 09:46:46 UTC