- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 17:09:24 -0400
- To: kifer@cs.sunysb.edu (Michael Kifer)
- Cc: RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
kifer@cs.sunysb.edu (Michael Kifer) writes:
> > and I think we've decided, in principle, to add
> >
> > subclass Triple
> > property subject: TERM
> > property property: TERM
> > property value: TERM
>
> I don't believe we agreed to add a class triple.
As I recall, we acknowledged that we needed to see it in writing, and
you said you'd write it up. What I understood was being proposed is the
above (although I was hoping for some kind of hilog approach as well).
> I think we were discussing
> whether to use a hilog-style representation for rdf or a frame-based.
> A triple representation was also mentioned, but not agreed upon.
How is this Triple approach different from Frame-based? They seem the
same to me.
-- Sandro
Received on Thursday, 10 May 2007 21:09:29 UTC