- From: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
- Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 05:49:51 -0400
- To: "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
> > kifer@cs.sunysb.edu (Michael Kifer) writes: > > > and I think we've decided, in principle, to add > > > > > > subclass Triple > > > property subject: TERM > > > property property: TERM > > > property value: TERM > > > > I don't believe we agreed to add a class triple. > > As I recall, we acknowledged that we needed to see it in writing, and > you said you'd write it up. What I understood was being proposed is the > above (although I was hoping for some kind of hilog approach as well). I don't remember this action item for me. > > I think we were discussing > > whether to use a hilog-style representation for rdf or a frame-based. > > A triple representation was also mentioned, but not agreed upon. > > How is this Triple approach different from Frame-based? They seem the > same to me. All these approaches are "the same" at some level. The difference is the syntax. In this particular case, whether we introduce a special class or reuse the syntax for slotted formulas. --michael > > -- Sandro >
Received on Friday, 11 May 2007 09:50:16 UTC