- From: Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:36:21 +0100
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- CC: "Boley, Harold" <Harold.Boley@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca>, public-rif-wg@w3.org
Sandro Hawke wrote: > > We need to decide what goes in the first RIF Core draft, don't we? > > I lean towards using stripe-skipping (as is there now, more or less), to > reduce the risk of people looking at the first example XML and deciding > RIF stinks because of the super-ugly XML. :-) But maybe the people who > matter wont decide so lightly. That's what I meant: we only need to decide how our first examples look, and explain how that XML syntax is derived from the abstract one. And we can say explicitely that no decision has been yet made regarding the precise XML syntax for RIF Core and these are for illustrative purposes only. And I agree that we should avoid having people who will read WD focus on aspects we barely discussed yet (and that ugly examples might indeed have that effect :-) Christian
Received on Tuesday, 30 January 2007 15:34:54 UTC