- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 00:04:00 +0000
- To: "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Dear all, I was asked by Chris to remind again to forward again a reminder on the pending discussion about the special notation '#' for class membership and in RIF since this should be discussed in the upcoming Teleconf. In the last f2f I was asked to send a use case for this, where I sent the - obvious - RDF use case, see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2007Sep/0184.html For your convenience I copy this here again: -------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/actions/350 The class membership notation '#' is intended to reflect the common feature of many rule and object oriented languages for being able to express memebership of a class (or type?) A possible use for this is for RDF's rdf:type construct... To reflect this in the current RDF/RDFS embeddings, one could add to 1) Add to RDF embedding: Forall ?c,?o ?o#?c :- ?o[rdf:type -> ?c] ------- ACTION done, what follows is additional discussion ;-) -------- This alone, obviously doesn't make too much sense, but in connection with the additional subclass notation '##' one could safe two rules in the RDFS embedding: 2) Add to RDFs embedding: Forall ?c1,?c2 ?c1##?c2 :- ?c1[rdfs:subclassOf-> ?c2] and remove: Forall ?x,?y,?z ?z[rdf:type -> ?y] :- And (?x[rdfs:subClassOf -> ?y] ?z[rdf:type -> ?x]), Forall ?x,?y,?z ?x[rdfs:subClassOf -> ?z] :- And (?x[rdfs:subClassOf -> ?y] ?y[rdfs:subClassOf -> ?z]), In total, the use of the special notation adds two rules and saves us two rules in the RDF/RDFS embedding. Pretty much equals out ;-) That's why I am absolutely neutral on whether we chould keep that feature or no. Axel p.s.: Note that I have to send regrets for the next Telecon, since I will be travelling most likely (could be I get connection from train or airport, but no guarantees.) -- Dr. Axel Polleres email: axel@polleres.net url: http://www.polleres.net/
Received on Friday, 7 December 2007 00:04:24 UTC