- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 23:37:29 +0000
- To: public-rif-wg@w3.org
Action-393 http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/actions/393 has been completed by my previous reply to Michael and a summary of options I added in the end of the built-ins wiki page: http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/List_of_BLD_built-ins Please check the new Section "Syntactic Representation of built-ins in RIF" on that page. 3 options are discussed and pros and cons listed, examples in representation syntax and XML syntax given, as far as possible: a. No special representation: IRIs are sufficient to identify built-ins b. Modules c. Special syntax to distinguish evaluated predicates from logical predicates comments welcome, Axel -- Dr. Axel Polleres email: axel@polleres.net url: http://www.polleres.net/
Received on Thursday, 6 December 2007 23:37:46 UTC