- From: Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr>
- Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:40:26 +0200
- To: Paul Vincent <pvincent@tibco.com>
- CC: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Rule Interchange Format (RIF) Working Group WG" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Paul Vincent wrote: > Dave - yes I think they are related. Your entry at > http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/Arch/Data_Sets is a good > discussion point. > > The issue here is that one of the uses* for RIF is to provide a generic > rule representation for things like Domain Specific Languages** (and > specifically industry-specific standardized XML schema). Well, my understanding is that this is the subject of issue 32, rather than 33. Following Dave's framing of the problem in the above entry for the Arch document, issue 32 relates to the question of the data model, issue 33 to that of data set identification. The issues are obviously related, but I think that they are orthogonal. Christian > * IMHO this is the most important critical success factor for RIF > (outside of the "semantic web"...). > ** Schema like those provided by ACORD, MISMO, XBRL, RosettaNet, etc
Received on Tuesday, 10 April 2007 14:40:17 UTC