- From: Paul Vincent <pvincent@tibco.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 04:23:07 -0700
- To: "Dave Reynolds" <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Rule Interchange Format \(RIF\) Working Group WG" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Dave - yes I think they are related. Your entry at http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/Arch/Data_Sets is a good discussion point. The issue here is that one of the uses* for RIF is to provide a generic rule representation for things like Domain Specific Languages** (and specifically industry-specific standardized XML schema). * IMHO this is the most important critical success factor for RIF (outside of the "semantic web"...). ** Schema like those provided by ACORD, MISMO, XBRL, RosettaNet, etc Paul Vincent TIBCO | ETG/Business Rules > -----Original Message----- > From: public-rif-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rif-wg-request@w3.org] > On Behalf Of Dave Reynolds > Sent: 10 April 2007 11:57 > To: Rule Interchange Format (RIF) Working Group WG > Subject: Re: ISSUE-33: Specification of data sources in RIF > > > Rule Interchange Format (RIF) Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > > ISSUE-33: Specification of data sources in RIF > > > > http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/issues/33 > > > > Raised by: Deborah Nichols > > On product: Technical Design > > > > Raised by Deborah Nichols on behalf of Christian de Sainte Marie > > > > How should data sources be specified in RIF? (For future discussion.) > > Does this related to the question of DataSets? > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2007Mar/0020.html > > Dave > -- > Hewlett-Packard Limited > Registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN > Registered No: 690597 England >
Received on Tuesday, 10 April 2007 11:23:23 UTC