- From: Nichols, Deborah L. <dlnichols@mitre.org>
- Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 21:44:48 -0500
- To: "Leora Morgenstern" <leora@us.ibm.com>, <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: "Chris Welty" <cawelty@frontiernet.net>, <jpan@csd.abdn.ac.uk>
- Message-ID: <0C71F5A5019DB3449414EA41D9440DEB0128A6E8@IMCSRV1.MITRE.ORG>
Leora, Overall I think the condensation of this use case turned out quite well. I would have liked if it had retained the mention of RIF-enabled decision support as having a wider field of application (because of MITRE's convoy support example), but it's easy enough for a reader to extrapolate. One sentence in the case raised questions for me, since I have no medical expertise: Bob tells the neurologist that he was "taking Diamicron, ... forgetting that he had been switched to Metformin." (1) The sentence suggests that Bob was in fact previously taking Diamicron, but that is the first mention of Diamicron, at least by that name -- perhaps it is equivalent to something mentioned earlier? (2) The example stated that the doctor switched Bob to "Glucophage and Avandia." True, earlier, a parenthesis mentioned that Glucophage is "(metformin, one of the biguanides)"; but it's not clear to me whether metformin is the generic equivalent of Glucophage, or a class of drugs to which Glucophage belongs. The information on Bob that is pulled from the patient data base says he is "taking Metformin." I might guess from this that Metformin is somehow equivalent to (or subsumes) Glucophage, but it could be clearer. Perhaps clarifying those details would illustrate that ontological knowledge (here, about related or equivalent drug classes) is indeed essential if rules are really going to operate together. In that connection, I liked the inclusion of Jeff's sentence referring to ontologies as one source of information for decision support. Deborah ________________________________ From: public-rif-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rif-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Leora Morgenstern Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 9:40 AM To: public-rif-wg@w3.org Cc: Chris Welty; jpan@csd.abdn.ac.uk Subject: Re: [RIF][UCR]Decision Support After the meeting in Mandelieu, I had been asked to shorten the exising Decision Support use case. The resulting use case is at http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/UCR/Ruleset_Integration__for_Medic al_Decision_Support . Since Jeff's extensions essentially subsume that use case (modulo some minor issues of style/grammar/presentation), I propose that I incorporate Jeff's changes into the use case. Regards, Leora Morgenstern "Jeff Z. Pan" <jpan@csd.abdn.ac.uk> Sent by: public-rif-wg-request@w3.org 03/06/2006 07:36 PM To public-rif-wg@w3.org cc Leora Morgenstern/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, Chris Welty <cawelty@frontiernet.net> Subject [RIF][UCR]Decision Support Dear RIFers, > Jeff Pan has taken an action to propose a slight extension to the example for Decision Support. I have added a new wiki page to address this action: http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/UCR/Decision_Support/JeffPan%27s_p roposed_slight_extension_to_the_example?action=show The extended example is based on discussions with Christine Golbreich, Giorgos Stamou and Giorgos Stoilos. The motivation of slightly changing the scenario is to use some real-world medical recommedation (thanks to Christine's suggestion) in our example. Greetings, Jeff -- Dr. Jeff Z. Pan (http://www.csd.abdn.ac.uk/~jpan/) Department of Computing Science, The University of Aberdeen
Received on Thursday, 9 March 2006 02:44:56 UTC