[UCR] Detailed use cases added to the analysis of Policy-Based Transaction Authorization and Access Control

Hi,

Two detailed use cases can be found in section Narratives (or detailed 
use cases) of the analysis of the Policy-Based Transaction Authorization 
and Access Control category. Also, the whole analysis has been slightly 
refined:

http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/Policy-Based_Transaction_Authorization_and_Access_Control

Some remarks on the analysis follow.

The first use case reflects one of the submissions of Benjamin Grosof, 
but it abstracts away from the  rules given in the RuleML/SWSL 
presentation syntax of CPL. The second use case reflects one of the 
submissions of REWERSE, but the proposed classification of rules is not 
explicitly present.  (Following Allen's proposal, this use case 
presentation contains also comments on interoperability vs. interchange, 
cf. 
http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/RIF_Use_Cases_and_Requirements#Design_Goals 
)

The stated requirements on the RIF have been drawn based on all use 
cases in the analyzed category.
Benjamin, Said: It would be good, I think, if you could take a look at 
these requirements to see whether we succesfully managed to extract them 
from Benjamin's contributions to use cases.

Regards from Munich,
Paula