- From: Gerd Wagner <wagnerg@tu-cottbus.de>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:27:51 +0100
- To: "'Enrico Franconi'" <franconi@inf.unibz.it>, "'W3C RIF WG'" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
> > Not allowing to express classification statements for > > data literals (but instead imposing the corresponding > > statement for a blank node) is clearly an anomaly of > > the current RDF semantics > > Partly agree, but it *is* part of the standard. > > > and can't hardly be the basis for any requirement on RIF. > > Well, you have to consider that RIF has to comply to the W3C > standards, being itself a W3C standard, right? Well, complying with a feature, which is not really a feature but rather a bug, would be stupid, wouldn't it? -Gerd
Received on Monday, 16 January 2006 17:30:46 UTC