- From: Ginsberg, Allen <AGINSBERG@imc.mitre.org>
- Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 09:38:29 -0500
- To: <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <90A462F2D6E869478007CD2F65DE877C528E4F@IMCSRV5.MITRE.ORG>
================================================================== ** MITRE-1 Spectrum Policy Deployment In The World of Cognitive Radios -- Background information This use case is based on an extrapolation from 1) the way spectrum use is currently regulated and 2) a plausible model of how things might evolve to accommodate the eventual deployment of "cognitive radios." Such a device is permitted some degree of autonomous operation and dynamic reconfiguration. Currently, under the ITU-Radio treaty every country retains a sovereign right to regulate spectrum allocation and access within its own territory. That is not likely to change. So, in the future, as spectrum policies are made machine-readable (using ontologies and rules) every country will promulgate its policies within its territory using whatever formal language it wants. Perhaps the world will agree on a single standard representation formalism for writing these policies, perhaps not. However, it will be the responsibility of manufacturers of cognitive radio equipment (cell phones, wireless access points, etc.) to make sure that their devices are compliant with the policies of whatever regions in which they expect them to operate. It may be that a given manufacturer finds it efficient to use a certain kind of knowledge representation language inside its devices in order to govern the behavior of the device. It is not likely that the manufacturer would want to support additional representation formats (with associated inference engines) in order to be able to allow the device to reason about multiple regional policies. It seems clear that "semantic web technology" should make it possible for a cognitive radio to operate in a compliant manner across national boundaries (and other policy boundaries). Life would be easier if everyone agreed to write all their policies and device-knowledge in the same representation language. But that is probably unrealistic. -- First Use Case: Policy Downloading using a Global Spectrum Policy Server Suppose a user of a spectrum utilizing device moves from one policy region to another. As the user enters the new region, the device is signaled that it needs to download a regional policy in order to operate legally. This policy is written in a formalism that the device cannot understand. In this case a server could provide a service to the device. (This is a server that might be maintained by a consortium of interested manufacturers.) For any device model that is known to the server, the server is able to translate (or at least provide an authorized translation) of any policy written in any format in a form that the given device can understand. Note that the translation of the policy need not be logically equivalent to the original or even a complete translation. The main requirement is that the translation does not allow the device to be used illegally. -- Variant on first Use Case: Policy Checking on Demand Another way in which this kind of regional policy issue could be addressed, is to make sure that before a device attempts to initiate any kind of spectrum utilizing activity in a region, it checks with a server to make sure its contemplated use of spectrum is legal. In that case the device does not need to download a policy itself, rather the server would have an understanding of the device. In the world of cognitive radio, a device's behavior may be related to a set of rules that govern its function, and these rules may be written in a representation format of the manufacturers choice. Therefore, in order for the policy check to work, the server needs to be able to relate the device representation language to the policy representation language. -- In both cases there is a need to relate the implications of a set of rules written in one language to the implications of a set of rules written in a different language. _______________________________________________________________ Dr. Allen Ginsberg The MITRE Corporation, Information Semantics aginsberg@mitre.org Center for Innovative Computing & Informatics Voice: 703-983-1604 7515 Colshire Drive, M/S H305 Fax: 703-983-1379 McLean, VA 22102-7508, USA
Received on Wednesday, 7 December 2005 14:51:07 UTC