- From: Till Mossakowski <Till.Mossakowski@dfki.de>
- Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 16:07:07 +0100
- To: public-rif-comments@w3.org
Dear RIF community, I am the chairman of the OntoIOp ISO standarisation effort [1,2], and we are considering to integrate RIF. Now one specific question arose: Is there a way of using a logical theory and RIF-PRD together? The logical theory could be formulated in RIF-Core or RIF-BLD (or even OWL or FOL), and would play the role of general integrity constraints. The question is what happens if an update produced by RIF-PRD rules violates such an integrity constraint. One could block the update, or one could try to modify the update in a minimal way such that the integrity constraint is still satisfied (cf. M. Winslett: "Updating logical databases") - although this would deviate from RIF-PRD's operational semantics. Even another option would be to use the logical theory as definitions, defining certain predicates in terms of other "primitive" predicates. Then only the primitive predicates would be updated by rules, and the defined ones would follow their definitions. Have such issues been discussed? I am grateful for any pointers. All the best, Till [1] http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntoIOp [2] http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=59599 -- Prof. Dr. Till Mossakowski Cartesium, room 2.51 Phone +49-421-218-64226 DFKI GmbH Bremen Fax +49-421-218-9864226 Cyber-Physical Systems Till.Mossakowski@dfki.de Enrique-Schmidt-Str. 5, D-28359 Bremen http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~till/ Deutsches Forschungszentrum fuer Kuenstliche Intelligenz GmbH principal office, *not* the address for mail etc.!!!: Trippstadter Str. 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern management board: Prof. Wolfgang Wahlster (chair), Dr. Walter Olthoff supervisory board: Prof. Hans A. Aukes (chair) Amtsgericht Kaiserslautern, HRB 2313
Received on Saturday, 24 March 2012 00:18:56 UTC