- From: Luis Polo <luis.polo@fundacionctic.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:38:08 +0100
- To: public-rif-comments@w3.org
- Cc: Jose Maria Alvarez Rodriguez <JoseM.Rodriguez@fundacionctic.org>
Dear all, we are testing RIFle support for RIF-Core validation and we found some problems with the imports of RDF/OWL files, at least in the RIF-Core testcases. In particular, the problem is that files are not found in the given URL, so the documents can not be retrieved from the web. We have detected this problem for the following tests: * Non-Annotation_Entailment * OWL_Combination_Vocabulary_Separation_Inconsistency_1 * OWL_Combination_Vocabulary_Separation_Inconsistency_2 * RDF_Combination_Blank_Node * RDF_Combination_Constant_Equivalence_1 * RDF_Combination_Constant_Equivalence_2 * RDF_Combination_Constant_Equivalence_3 * RDF_Combination_Constant_Equivalence_4 * RDF_Combination_Constant_Equivalence_Graph_Entailment * RDF_Combination_Invalid_Constant_1 * RDF_Combination_Invalid_Constant_2 * RDF_Combination_Invalid_Profiles_1 * RDF_Combination_SubClass * RDF_Combination_SubClass_2 Please, notice that it shouldn't be a problem whether you rename the URL of the file as local path. However, this is an inconvenience for automatic testing, and must be done by hand. Moreover, there are some syntactic problems with some these RDF/OWL files, because RDF prefix and namespace are missing. Thus they are not RDF valid. * RDF_Combination_SubClass * RDF_Combination_SubClass_2 Best, p. -- Luis Polo Paredes R&D Department CTIC Foundation E-mail: luis.polo@fundacionctic.org Phone:+34 984 29 12 12 Parque Científico Tecnológico Gijón-Asturias-Spain www.fundacionctic.org
Received on Thursday, 12 November 2009 09:38:49 UTC