[/TR/ethical-web-principles/] Formal Objection (Proposed Statement review)

From:
  https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/EthicalWebPrinciples/results

Formal Objection to W3C Ethical Web Principles Statement

2.6 The Web Enables Freedom of Expression

The current articulation of support for freedom of expression in this 
section in our view should be improved based on accessibility 
considerations.

The line, “We will create web technologies and platforms that encourage 
free expression, where that does not contravene other human rights,” 
suggests that freedom of expression is subordinate to other human rights.
The concern is that without robust freedom of expression, it becomes 
challenging to identify, critique, and address human rights abuses, 
including issues related to accessibility and disability rights.

We propose that the initial sentence be revised to: “We will create web 
technologies and platforms that encourage free expression.” This 
revision maintains the principle of free expression, removes any caveats 
while retaining the broader principle in the remaining text of the 
section and builds on the specific accessibility and disability 
discussion in Section 2.4.

2.7 The Web Makes It Possible to Verify Information
The current use of the term “misinformation” raises concerns about 
potential misuse for state censorship, which could conflict with the 
principle of free expression outlined in Section2.6 as previously discussed.
To avoid this issue, a more precise and neutral term should be adopted.


Instead of the word “misinformation,” we recommend changing the relevant 
sentence to the following:

“We have a responsibility to build web technologies to address both 
deliberate and inadvertent attempts to mislead, and to maintain the 
integrity of information for public good.” This adjustment would better 
reflect the intent to promote accurate information while safeguarding 
against censorship and preserving freedom of expression.

Received on Thursday, 12 September 2024 12:43:25 UTC