Re: Watermarking [Re: Campaign for position of chair and mandate to close this community group] from B. Ross Ashley on 2014-01-14 (public-restrictedmedia@w3.org from January 2014)

From: B. Ross Ashley <brashley46@tfnet.ca>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 00:03:52 -0500
To: public-restrictedmedia@w3.org
Message-ID: <52D4C538.4090400@tfnet.ca>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

+1

On 14-01-13 06:54 PM, Duncan Bayne wrote:
>> non-user-modifiable client components
> 
> What a useful phrase.  The requirement for those
> "non-user-modifiable client components" is essentially the cause of
> all the conflict.  That is the *one* point that has been identified
> as non-negotiable by both sides.
> 
> So, that's how I'd express things so far:
> 
> 'Big media' has demanded that the W3C allow 'non-user-modifiable
> client components' to become part of the Open Web. Everyone else
> has demanded that the W3C not do so, because said components are
> inimical to Open Web principles.
> 
> I *think* that's the core of the issue.
> 


- -- 
B. Ross Ashley
registered Linux user 548111
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS1MU4AAoJEFWSUDbPLxNGNecH/i4Lei/BbqgryJJEra39pt5Q
Lk95zfbL0BSQf4want2abuH9Y44qdmfAfa9PhRrcYOeQ2xuP6BAU57yLz4ijRYeC
a7vf7cn96pvLPMufmCxuXxvYFHBcxwj4gSp9LNTH1z5OHhBnbxGzI/FxRvcQB3ex
eLUEWrTzQGw5i/1LIKo3D0c+dCcBQyX3T83NBYk4+1jwrOYuLtezqMSHGLR0binE
q+KLg0/tnd75tAfBe+sOG2nGrNaBUvqSz/96AZ1ejbYzmoVwoRBuTyLpJkBBpJL4
FFL2yGEciZEyLOQUCqH6S877Q+DxBqs9mDG8H1iq6FZE6s7K7NIRw5uY746AYow=
=EYew
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Tuesday, 14 January 2014 05:05:04 UTC