Re: Campaign for position of chair and mandate to close this community group

Fred Andrews:
> Even a do-not-copy flag is a mis-feature, and this could be
> implemented in a copyleft Open Source licensed user agent.

I am not against delivering copyright data to the browser. But one bit
certainly would not be enough. See for example:
http://creativecommons.org/ns

> You block my proposals and have claimed not to agree with me, but I
> really do not understand your position.

I have voted against and will vote against proposals I disagree with.

>  Would I be right that you and/or the EFF were prepared to
> endorse the EME if Tim agreed to hold a discussion on the matter?

1. A discussion is taking place.
2. I did not and do not endorse EME.

(And I can not and do not speak for the EFF.)

> I would be more than happy to give Tim and the W3C more time to
> consider their position, but only if they suspend the change to the
> charter and suspend work that depends on it, otherwise we are just
> being played while they consolidate their position.

I do not agree that EME proponents are "consolidating their position".
That the MPAA joined the W3C might have strengthened them but it first
of all is a sign of the weakness of the EME-proponents as far as I am
concerned.

> What are you doing except supporting Tim's and the W3C's position?

When will you stop beating your wife? I will disagree with proposals
which are counterproductive and do not help to oppose DRM and EME.

Cheers,
Andreas

Received on Monday, 13 January 2014 09:12:30 UTC