- From: Mhyst <mhysterio@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 00:42:33 +0100
- Cc: "public-restrictedmedia@w3.org" <public-restrictedmedia@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAF9YMwVEATfhogwbxhMdvNZJG75E+JsbwO1+jPfoa8G=W8sOnw@mail.gmail.com>
By then it was just industry regulations to ensure the right to print to someone for some time. Today's copyright is a different animal. It's ridiculous, we cannot make people feel guilty or like criminals just to make some companies more rich. The film industry is not in danger at all. 2014-02-07 Duncan Bayne <dhgbayne@fastmail.fm>: > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014, at 03:07 PM, Mhyst wrote: > > Copyright is not a natural right we all have, but an agreement between > > creators and the society. > > Actually, copyright was *originally* created as a means of religious and > political censorship. It later evolved into its current form - although > that original use is still popular in certain circles. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_copyright_law > > "The origin of copyright law in most European countries lies in efforts > by the church and governments to regulate and control the output of > printers." > > -- > Duncan Bayne > ph: +61 420817082 | web: http://duncan-bayne.github.com/ | skype: > duncan_bayne > > I usually check my mail every 24 - 48 hours. If there's something > urgent going on, please send me an SMS or call me. > >
Received on Thursday, 6 February 2014 23:43:01 UTC