- From: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 16:28:25 -0700
- To: Duncan Bayne <dhgbayne@fastmail.fm>
- Cc: "public-restrictedmedia@w3.org" <public-restrictedmedia@w3.org>
Sent from my iPhone On Oct 17, 2013, at 2:54 PM, Duncan Bayne <dhgbayne@fastmail.fm> wrote: >> As I've repeatedly explained, free software users and some content owners >> have, through their individual decisions and principles, forever >> alienated themselves from each other. They cannot meet, because there respective >> requirements are logically incompatible. Insisting that we bridge this >> divide is insisting on something impossible. > > No-one is insisting that anyone bridge that divide. > > What we're saying is that the W3C is not an appropriate body to address > DRM, because DRM is inimical to the W3Cs stated goals and mission. One > of those reasons is that CDMs - the sole reason for EME to exist - will > not be fully implementable in FOSS. Putting aside the absence of a formal FOSS requirement anywhere in the W3C policies, I have a hard time discerning any blue sky between EME and <object> on this criterion. ...Mark > > -- > Duncan Bayne > ph: +61 420817082 | web: http://duncan-bayne.github.com/ | skype: > duncan_bayne > > I usually check my mail every 24 - 48 hours. If there's something > urgent going on, please send me an SMS or call me. >
Received on Thursday, 17 October 2013 23:28:54 UTC