- From: DANET PIERRE <PDANET@hachette-livre.fr>
- Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 21:15:19 +0200
- To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- CC: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@hsivonen.fi>, "public-restrictedmedia@w3.org List" <public-restrictedmedia@w3.org>
A lot of members, sure, but On ultraviolet, do you know how many items (movies) are available through their system ? Tnx Pierre Danet Hachette > Le 16 oct. 2013 à 20:51, "David Singer" <singer@apple.com> a écrit : > > >> On Oct 16, 2013, at 10:46 , Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@hsivonen.fi> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 7:47 PM, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote: >>>> So far, we haven't seen a deployed CDM that is like a plug-in in terms >>>> of the distribution model. >>> >>> >>> True, but I would expect that if OMA PDCF ever got traction, >> >> What's OMA PDCF and why would it lead to plug-in-like EME CDM distribution? > > OpenMobileAlliance. > > It's a protection format that's intended to be multi-vendor usable (they include key-exchange, and so on). It has not got much traction since publication, I admit. > >> >>> or as the Ultraviolet ecosystem grows, we might see a change there. >> >> Is the UltraViolet ecosystem growing? > > They have a lot of members. > >> And even if the UltraViolet >> ecosystem was growing, why would it lead to plug-in-like distribution >> of EME CDMs when the EME/Netflix model makes UltraViolet >> obsolete/moot? (If you generally watch a given movie once, why bother >> with the complexity of UltraViolet when you could instead stream the >> movie once from Netflix and then not worry about file management, >> ownership tracking or whether DRMs change?) > > > I am not going to comment on whether Ultraviolet has a good model, etc., I merely note it exists. > > David Singer > Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc. > >
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2013 19:15:47 UTC