- From: Rick <graham.rick@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 17:37:53 -0500
- To: "public-restrictedmedia@w3.org" <public-restrictedmedia@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAGDjS3cwLjo5FvDHxTSWbG3ONjH0=zwhXX_wnkE0=o+-kpig6w@mail.gmail.com>
grr. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Rick <graham.rick@gmail.com> Date: Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 5:37 PM Subject: Re: SVG 3D transforms To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>wrote: > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 1:30 AM, Nicolas Froidure > <nfroidure@elitwork.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm authoring a JS library to stream SVG Path Datas ( > > https://github.com/nfroidure/SVGPathData) and i would like to implement > SVG > > 3D transforms. > > > > When combining multiple SVG 3D transformations, should i keep the z > > coordinate value and pass it to other transformations or should i always > > consider that z value is 0? > > The spec for 3d transforms is > <http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-transforms/>, and the interaction with > SVG specifically is > <http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-transforms/#svg-three-dimensional-functions>. > I guess I knew about 3D xforms, but I hadn't paid much attention to it. Is it going to be in 2.0? Would be cool, I could play with that. > > ~TJ > > -- *If this were a movie, the country with the flying death robots would not be the hero. * -- *If this were a movie, the country with the flying death robots would not be the hero. *
Received on Monday, 25 November 2013 22:38:21 UTC