- From: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 12:29:39 -0700
- To: Norbert Bollow <nb@bollow.ch>
- Cc: "B. Ross Ashley" <brashley46@tfnet.ca>, public-restrictedmedia@w3.org
Received on Monday, 20 May 2013 19:30:11 UTC
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Norbert Bollow <nb@bollow.ch> wrote: > Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com> wrote: > > > My point was that what is or is not legal in a given > > country is something that service providers need to watch out for, > > not something we need to debate here. > > Even though W3C is not an intergovernmental organization, it is a body > that makes global Internet governance decisions. > IIUC, W3C produces technical "Recommendations" which people may follow or not as they choose. > > Any such decisions that are incompatible with existing national law > (that doesn't violate internationally recognized human rights), or with > how national laws could reasonably be changed, are a very serious > matter. That is not the kind of thing that W3C could legitimately > decide without consultation of the parliaments of the democratic > countries of the world. > Well, I'm going to leave it to the W3C team and Director to determine whether any of those things apply here. > > Greetings, > Norbert >
Received on Monday, 20 May 2013 19:30:11 UTC