Re: Title and description of this group may mislead.

On 14/03/13 01:02, Fred Andrews wrote:
> There is no dispute that sever owners have a right to limit access
> to served content and there are non-DRM, unencumbered, open
> web technologies, already available to meet these needs. 

Perhaps you could enumerate them, to illuminate the discussion?

Do you mean "usernames and passwords"?

> I suggest that the only disputed technology is 'strong DRM' and that
> the title and purpose of this group should reflect this.

How would you distinguish "strong DRM" from "weak DRM", and determine
what sort falls into what category?

Gerv

Received on Thursday, 14 March 2013 15:39:31 UTC