- From: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 07:22:48 -0700
- To: Hugo Roy <hugo@fsfe.org>
- Cc: "public-restrictedmedia@w3.org" <public-restrictedmedia@w3.org>
Sent from my iPhone On Jun 27, 2013, at 1:37 AM, Hugo Roy <hugo@fsfe.org> wrote: > + 2013-06-26 Wed 20:32, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>: > >> In fact, the technologies we're discussing are widely deployed without >> legal challenge. Not taking sides involves bringing the positive influence >> of the standardization process to any technology that is relevant and which >> has support amongst our members, within the policies are procedures we have >> established. > > This is not true. > > The DRM technology in DVD has brought legal challenges in France > (regarding issue of relying on copyright exception to make private > copies). > > DVD-CSS has brought legal challenges in Finland regarding > technological measure circumvention. Under EU law, only > _effective_ technological measures are protected from (some kind > of) circumvention. In Finland, the court decided DVD-CSS was not > effective and thus could be circumvented with no problem (but I > think there were different outcomes in the US). > > The current DRM technologies in BluRay are bringing multiple > challenges in France, as the VLC media player tries to act > lawfully by not infringing any right while being able to play > BluRays. > > And I'm sure there are many more. I was referring to DRM technologies deployed today on the web. Sorry for not being clearer. ...Mark > > -- > Hugo Roy | Free Software Foundation Europe, www.fsfe.org > FSFE Legal Team, Deputy Coordinator, www.fsfe.org/legal > FSFE French Team, Coordinator, www.fsfe.org/fr/ > > Support Free Software, sign up! https://fsfe.org/support
Received on Thursday, 27 June 2013 14:23:17 UTC