- From: Hugo Roy <hugo@fsfe.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:37:07 +0200
- To: public-restrictedmedia@w3.org
- Message-ID: <20130627083707.GC4095@synclavier.ampoliros.net>
+ 2013-06-26 Wed 20:32, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>: > In fact, the technologies we're discussing are widely deployed without > legal challenge. Not taking sides involves bringing the positive influence > of the standardization process to any technology that is relevant and which > has support amongst our members, within the policies are procedures we have > established. This is not true. The DRM technology in DVD has brought legal challenges in France (regarding issue of relying on copyright exception to make private copies). DVD-CSS has brought legal challenges in Finland regarding technological measure circumvention. Under EU law, only _effective_ technological measures are protected from (some kind of) circumvention. In Finland, the court decided DVD-CSS was not effective and thus could be circumvented with no problem (but I think there were different outcomes in the US). The current DRM technologies in BluRay are bringing multiple challenges in France, as the VLC media player tries to act lawfully by not infringing any right while being able to play BluRays. And I'm sure there are many more. -- Hugo Roy | Free Software Foundation Europe, www.fsfe.org FSFE Legal Team, Deputy Coordinator, www.fsfe.org/legal FSFE French Team, Coordinator, www.fsfe.org/fr/ Support Free Software, sign up! https://fsfe.org/support
Received on Thursday, 27 June 2013 08:37:48 UTC