- From: Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:10:37 +1000
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>
- Cc: Olivier Thereaux <Olivier.Thereaux@bbc.co.uk>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@hsivonen.fi>, Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>, "public-restrictedmedia@w3.org" <public-restrictedmedia@w3.org>, "timbl@w3.org" <timbl@w3.org>
On 18 Jun 2013, at 19:42, Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net> wrote: > So even before being able to encrypt the data, it would be useful to carry with the resource (media file, text, etc.) the associated rights. This can be useful in many contexts, broader than just encrypted media, such as creativecommons document, ways of paying an artist through donations, etc. etc. And there are candidates for such information, for example: ODRL [1] MPEG-21 Part5/6 [2] > Encryption seems to me as the cannon solution, before even dealing with the simpler, wider scenarios. Agree. The entire content management value chain must be considered (of which, the enforcement mechanism is only just one part) [3] More recent examples of such scenarios can be found on the IPTC web site [4]. These use cases address rights-views for distributed content to editors at newspapers and broadcasters. Cheers... Renato Iannella Semantic Identity http://semanticidentity.com Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206 [1] http://www.w3.org/community/odrl/ [2] http://mpeg.chiariglione.org/standards/mpeg-21/rights-expression-language [3] http://xml.coverpages.org/IPR-CMDRMWP200304.pdf [4] http://dev.iptc.org/RightsML-Use-Cases
Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2013 14:11:10 UTC